Difference between revisions of "VOCWiki talk:Wiki cleanup 2014-15"

From VOC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Note that there is an existing Category:Tips that contains a bunch of useful articles. This should probably be merged with the new Category:Advice ~~~~")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Category Tips==
 
Note that there is an existing [[:Category:Tips]] that contains a bunch of useful articles.  This should probably be merged with the new [[:Category:Advice]]
 
Note that there is an existing [[:Category:Tips]] that contains a bunch of useful articles.  This should probably be merged with the new [[:Category:Advice]]
  
 
[[User:ScottN|Scott Nelson]] ([[User talk:ScottN|talk]]) 23:41, 26 September 2014 (PDT)
 
[[User:ScottN|Scott Nelson]] ([[User talk:ScottN|talk]]) 23:41, 26 September 2014 (PDT)
 +
 +
 +
==VOCWiki Category / Namespace==
 +
 +
VOCWiki currently has it's own namespace.  Does it make sense to give it it's own category too?  Also, at one point when trips were being organized on the wiki, I think Chris Michalak may have considered giving the trip pages their own namespace too.  But that's probably not necessary now that the wiki is not being constantly barraged by people signing up for trips.
 +
 +
[[User:ScottN|Scott Nelson]] ([[User talk:ScottN|talk]]) 23:51, 26 September 2014 (PDT)

Revision as of 23:51, 26 September 2014

Category Tips

Note that there is an existing Category:Tips that contains a bunch of useful articles. This should probably be merged with the new Category:Advice

Scott Nelson (talk) 23:41, 26 September 2014 (PDT)


VOCWiki Category / Namespace

VOCWiki currently has it's own namespace. Does it make sense to give it it's own category too? Also, at one point when trips were being organized on the wiki, I think Chris Michalak may have considered giving the trip pages their own namespace too. But that's probably not necessary now that the wiki is not being constantly barraged by people signing up for trips.

Scott Nelson (talk) 23:51, 26 September 2014 (PDT)